From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trowell v. Meads

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 17, 1993
618 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Summary

In Trowell the plaintiff sought a permanent restraining order against her former husband, contending that he had assaulted her by making threats during a telephone conversation while he was involuntarily confined in a Florida state mental hospital.

Summary of this case from Knight v. Jacobson

Opinion

No. 92-3292.

May 17, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County, E. Vernon Douglas, J.

Wayne H. Basford, Patient Legal Services, Florida State Hosp., Chattahoochee, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.


Appellant seeks review of a "permanent restraining order" entered against him in response to a "petition for injunction on [sic] domestic violence" filed by appellee, his former wife, pursuant to section 741.30, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992). Appellant argues that, as a matter of law, appellee failed to present evidence sufficient to establish her entitlement to relief pursuant to that statute. We agree and, accordingly, reverse.

The trial court based its order upon the conclusion that appellant "committed an assault upon [appellee] over the telephone, notwithstanding the fact that he is involuntarily committed at the Florida State Hospital in Chattahoochee, Florida, and is not at liberty to leave said place of confinement." "Assault" is defined as "an intentional, unlawful threat by word or act to do violence to the person of another, coupled with an apparent ability to do so, and doing some act which creates a well-founded fear in such other person that such violence is imminent." § 784.011(1), Fla. Stat. (1991). No evidence was presented from which one might conclude that any of the elements of an assault had been established. Likewise, no evidence was presented from which one might conclude that appellee was the victim of, or had "reasonable cause to believe . . . she [was] about to become the victim of any [other] act of domestic violence," as that term is defined in section 741.30(1)(a). § 741.30(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1992). Therefore, it was error to enter the "permanent restraining order." See Johnson v. Brooks, 567 So.2d 34 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

REVERSED.

JOANOS, C.J., and MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Trowell v. Meads

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 17, 1993
618 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

In Trowell the plaintiff sought a permanent restraining order against her former husband, contending that he had assaulted her by making threats during a telephone conversation while he was involuntarily confined in a Florida state mental hospital.

Summary of this case from Knight v. Jacobson

supporting the proposition that without adequate findings supported by the record, a final judgment must be reversed

Summary of this case from Achurra v. Achurra
Case details for

Trowell v. Meads

Case Details

Full title:RONALD TROWELL, APPELLANT, v. CARLA JEAN MEADS, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 17, 1993

Citations

618 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Trowell v. State

In another appearance before this court, Mr. Trowell successfully obtained reversal of a permanent…

Rey v. Perez-Gurri

See Campbell v. Campbell, 584 So.2d 125 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Unlike the former husband in Trowell v. Meads,…