Opinion
No. 66780
02-25-2015
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER AFFIRMING IN PART, REVERSING IN PART AND REMANDING
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Adriana Escobar, Judge.
This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).
In his petition filed on April 11, 2014, appellant claimed that he was entitled to additional days of credit for the completion of several courses and for work credit. We conclude that appellant failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to any additional work credits. See NRS 209.4465. However, the district court's order did not address appellant's claim regarding credit for completing several courses while incarcerated. The record includes certificates from six different programs that appellant completed: Cage Your Rage, LLC Orientation, Life Management Skills, Vital Issues, CDL program, and Resumes and Interviews. See NRS 209.448; NRS 209.449. These courses were completed between July of 2002 and September of 2005, but they are not reflected in appellant's credits worksheet. Therefore, we remand this case back to the district court to determine whether appellant was entitled to credits for these courses. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order.
/s/_________, C.J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Tao
/s/_________, J.
Silver
cc: Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge
Glen Trogdon
Attorney General/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk