From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Troche v. Morgan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 21, 2013
NO. 1:12-CV-00176 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 21, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 1:12-CV-00176

03-21-2013

SHANNON EARL TROCHE, Plaintiff, v. DONALD MORGAN, Warden Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 22), in which she recommends that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be denied as moot because Plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint was granted subsequent to the filing of Defendant's motion. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed as of the date of this Order.

Having reviewed this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation thorough, well-reasoned, and correct and thus affirms and adopts it in its entirety. Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is thus DENIED AS MOOT (doc. 11). Defendant is free to re-file the motion or any other motion attacking Plaintiff's amended complaint.

SO ORDERED.

____________________

S. Arthur Spiegel

United States Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Troche v. Morgan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 21, 2013
NO. 1:12-CV-00176 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Troche v. Morgan

Case Details

Full title:SHANNON EARL TROCHE, Plaintiff, v. DONALD MORGAN, Warden Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 21, 2013

Citations

NO. 1:12-CV-00176 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 21, 2013)