From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tripp v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 13, 2003
276 Ga. 104 (Ga. 2003)

Opinion

S02A1876.

DECIDED: JANUARY 13, 2003

Right to speedy trial; constitutional question. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Downs.

Michael R. Duponte, Brian Steel, for appellant.

Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Christopher M. Quinn, Ashutosh S. Joshi, Assistant District Attorneys, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, for appellee.


The appellant, Hillman Tripp, appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion to bar his prosecution for murder based on the alleged violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. In balancing the factors set forth in Barker v. Wingo, we conclude that the State's delay in bringing Tripp to trial must be weighed against the State, but that factor is outweighed by the lack of prejudice to Tripp. As for prejudice, although the record shows that Tripp has suffered some anxiety and stress, Tripp was only incarcerated for several weeks and then was released on bond, and thus has not shown oppressive pretrial incarceration. More importantly, there is no evidence in the record that Tripp's defense has been impaired by the delay in bringing him to trial. For these reasons, we conclude that the trial court did not err in denying Tripp's motion to bar his prosecution.

"In analyzing the prejudice factor, we `consider three interests: (i) preventing oppressive pretrial incarceration, (ii) minimizing anxiety and concern of the defendant, and (iii) limiting the possibility that the defense will be impaired.' Brannen v. State, 274 Ga. 454, 456 ( 553 S.E.2d 813) (2001)." State v. Johnson, 274 Ga. 511, 513 ( 555 S.E.2d 710) (2001). Moreover, "`[o]f these forms of prejudice, "the most serious is the last, because the inability of a defendant adequately to prepare his case skews the fairness of the entire system."'" Johnson, 274 Ga. at 513, quoting Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647, 652 (II) ( 112 S.Ct. 2686, 120 L.Ed.2d 520) (1992).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.


DECIDED JANUARY 13, 2003.


Summaries of

Tripp v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 13, 2003
276 Ga. 104 (Ga. 2003)
Case details for

Tripp v. State

Case Details

Full title:TRIPP v. THE STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jan 13, 2003

Citations

276 Ga. 104 (Ga. 2003)
575 S.E.2d 507

Citing Cases

Watkins v. State

The record shows that Watkins was incarcerated for a few days and otherwise released on bond; thus, the…

State v. Lattimore

Further, the State notes that there is no evidence of any impairment to Lattimore's defense arising from the…