From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trinity Indus., Inc. v. Chi. Bridge & Iron Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 21, 2014
Civil Action No. 08-1709 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 21, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-1709

02-21-2014

TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, Defendant.


Judge Cathy Bissoon


ORDER

Through an exercise of the Court's inherent authority, this case hereby is STAYED pending completion of neutral evaluation/mediation. See Order (Doc. 92) (recommending same); see also Rice v. Astrue, 2010 WL 3607474, *2 (D. S.C. Sept. 9, 2010) ("a federal court has the inherent power to stay, sua sponte, an action before it") (citations and internal quotations omitted). For the duration of the stay, this case is and shall remain ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. Administrative closings comprise a familiar way in which courts remove cases from their active files without final adjudication. Penn West Assocs., Inc. v. Cohen, 371 F.3d 118, 127 (3d Cir. 2004) (citation and internal quotations omitted). Administrative closure is a docket control device used by the Court for statistical purposes, and it does not prejudice the rights of the parties in any manner. Honig v. Comcast of Georgia I, LLC, 537 F. Supp.2d 1277, 1290 n.8 (N.D. Ga. 2008).

As and when appropriate, any party may restore this action to the Court's active calendar upon application or by motion. See In re Arbitration Between Philadelphia Elec. Co. v. Nuclear Elec. Ins., Ltd., 845 F. Supp. 1026, 1028 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) (holding same).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

Cathy Bissoon

United States District Judge
cc (via ECF email notification): All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Trinity Indus., Inc. v. Chi. Bridge & Iron Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 21, 2014
Civil Action No. 08-1709 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 21, 2014)
Case details for

Trinity Indus., Inc. v. Chi. Bridge & Iron Co.

Case Details

Full title:TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 21, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-1709 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 21, 2014)