From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trimasa Rest. Partners v. Glob. Coverage, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 9, 2021
191 A.D.3d 490 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

13096 Index No. 153565/18 Case No. 2020-02557

02-09-2021

TRIMASA RESTAURANT PARTNERS, LLC, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. GLOBAL COVERAGE, INC., et al., Defendants–Respondents.

McKool Smith, P.C., New York ( Christopher P. Johnson of counsel) and McKool Smith, P.C., Austin, TX ( Joel L. Thollander of the bar of the State of Texas, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for appellant. Keidel, Weldon & Cunningham, LLP, White Plains ( Howard S. Kronberg of counsel), for respondents.


McKool Smith, P.C., New York ( Christopher P. Johnson of counsel) and McKool Smith, P.C., Austin, TX ( Joel L. Thollander of the bar of the State of Texas, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for appellant.

Keidel, Weldon & Cunningham, LLP, White Plains ( Howard S. Kronberg of counsel), for respondents.

Manzanet–Daniels, J.P., Gische, Gonza´lez, Shulman, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (O. Peter Sherwood, J.), entered May 13, 2020, which granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The complaint neither alleges that plaintiff made a specific request for insurance coverage for liability arising from the presence of lead paint at its property nor contains allegations that establish a special relationship between the parties that would support plaintiff's tort and contract claims against defendants ( see Voss v. Netherlands Ins. Co., 22 N.Y.3d 728, 734, 985 N.Y.S.2d 448, 8 N.E.3d 823 [2014] ; Hoffend & Sons, Inc. v. Rose & Kiernan, Inc., 7 N.Y.3d 152, 158, 818 N.Y.S.2d 798, 851 N.E.2d 1149 [2006] ). The allegations only describe a generalized request for adequate insurance, not an ongoing course of action and discussion regarding the specific coverage at issue ( see STB Invs. Corp. v. Sterling & Sterling, Inc., 178 A.D.3d 413, 111 N.Y.S.3d 170 [1st Dept. 2019] ).

The negligence and breach of fiduciary duty claims are also barred by the applicable three-year statutes of limitations, and the contract claim fails in addition for lack of an agreement.


Summaries of

Trimasa Rest. Partners v. Glob. Coverage, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 9, 2021
191 A.D.3d 490 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Trimasa Rest. Partners v. Glob. Coverage, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Trimasa Restaurant Partners, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Global Coverage…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 9, 2021

Citations

191 A.D.3d 490 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
191 A.D.3d 490
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 818