From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trilling v. Connecticut Indemnity Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 21, 1956
1 A.D.2d 1038 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Opinion

May 21, 1956


In an action on an insurance policy to recover for losses by reason of theft, the appeal is from an order insofar as it denied, in part, appellant's motion to examine before trial designated witnesses. Order modified by striking therefrom the second ordering paragraph and by adding to the first ordering paragraph after the words "that the witnesses" the words "Samuel Levine"; by adding to item "1." in the first ordering paragraph after the words "Arthur Rosen" the words "and Samuel Levine", and after the words "place of purchase" the words "and purchase price"; by adding to said paragraph after item "4." the words "AS TO SAMUEL LEVINE", and by adding to said paragraph items "5.", "6." and "7." as contained in the notice of motion dated January 20, 1956. As so modified, order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant; examination to proceed on five days' notice. Under the circumstances, the appellant is entitled to examine with respect to all of the items set forth in the notice of motion. Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Trilling v. Connecticut Indemnity Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 21, 1956
1 A.D.2d 1038 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)
Case details for

Trilling v. Connecticut Indemnity Company

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL TRILLING, Respondent, v. CONNECTICUT INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 21, 1956

Citations

1 A.D.2d 1038 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)