From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tricolo v. Centalanza

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 18, 1925
129 A. 923 (N.J. 1925)

Opinion

Argued March 20, 1925 —

Decided May 18, 1925.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 100 N.J.L. 231.

For the appellants, Thomas Brunetto.

For the respondent, Gaetano Belfatto.


Our examination of this case has led up to the conclusion that a right result was reached in the court below upon the facts, and, therefore, the judgment under review herein should be affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Tricolo v. Centalanza

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 18, 1925
129 A. 923 (N.J. 1925)
Case details for

Tricolo v. Centalanza

Case Details

Full title:JOHN TRICOLO, RESPONDENT, v. DONATO CENTALANZA AND RAFFAELE CENTALANZA…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 18, 1925

Citations

129 A. 923 (N.J. 1925)
129 A. 923