From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trice v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION SIX
Aug 12, 1997
950 S.W.2d 16 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

No. 71383

OPINION FILED: August 12, 1997

Appeal from Missouri Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; Honorable Margaret M. Neill, Judge.

Dave Hemingway, Public Defender, 1320 Market Street, Room 235, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, Cheryl A. Caponegro, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before: Reinhard, P.J., Karohl, J., and Dowd, Jr., J.



ORDER


Movant appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Trice v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION SIX
Aug 12, 1997
950 S.W.2d 16 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Trice v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL TRICE, Movant/Appellant, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION SIX

Date published: Aug 12, 1997

Citations

950 S.W.2d 16 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)