Triana v. State

2 Citing cases

  1. Villavicencio v. Sessions

    904 F.3d 658 (9th Cir. 2018)   Cited 43 times
    Limiting our review to the BIA decision

    Generally, in Nevada, a jury may convict without being unanimous as to the underlying means of committing the offense. See, e.g., Triana v. State, No. 54818, 2010 WL 3504809, at *1 (Nev. Jun. 9, 2010) ; Garcia-Gaona v. State, No. 63255, 2014 WL 989732, at *2 (Nev. Mar. 12, 2014) ("A unanimous general verdict of guilt will support a conviction so long as there is substantial evidence in support of one of the alternate theories of culpability.") (quoting Anderson v. State, 121 Nev. 511, 118 P.3d 184, 186 (2005) ).9. 879 F.3d at 948, line 3 - delete < the> between < because> and < jurors>.

  2. Villavicencio v. Sessions

    879 F.3d 941 (9th Cir. 2018)   Cited 8 times

    In Nevada, a jury may convict without being unanimous as to the underlying elements of the crime. See , e.g. , Triana v. State , No. 54818, 2010 WL 3504809, at *1 (Nev. Jun. 9, 2010) ; Garcia–Gaona v. State , No. 63255, 2014 WL 989732, at *2 (Nev. Mar. 12, 2014) ("A unanimous general verdict of guilt will support a conviction so long as there is substantial evidence in support of one of the alternate theories of culpability.") (quoting Anderson v. State , 121 Nev. 511, 118 P.3d 184, 186 (2005) ). Conceivably, a Nevada jury could convict an individual under N.R.S. § 454.351 for conspiring to manufacture amphetamines, or for conspiring to sell antibiotics, without further delineation.