From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trialgraphix v. Dacra Designmiami

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 10, 2002
813 So. 2d 253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 3D02-959.

April 10, 2002.

A case of original jurisdiction — Prohibition.

Isicoff, Ragatz Koeingsberg, and Eric D. Isicoff, and Teresa Ragatz, Miami, for petitioner.

Richard Richard, and Dennis Richard, Miami, for respondent.

Before COPE, LEVY and RAMIREZ, JJ.


Denied. See Panagakos v. Laufer, 779 So.2d 296, 297 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) ("Prohibition is an extraordinary writ that is extremely narrow in scope and operation. It exists to prevent `an inferior tribunal from acting in excess of jurisdiction but not to prevent an erroneous exercise of jurisdiction.'"), quoting English v. McCrary, 348 So.2d 293, 297 (Fla. 1977).


Summaries of

Trialgraphix v. Dacra Designmiami

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 10, 2002
813 So. 2d 253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Trialgraphix v. Dacra Designmiami

Case Details

Full title:TRIALGRAPHIX, INC., Petitioner, v. DACRA DESIGNMIAMI, LTD., Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 10, 2002

Citations

813 So. 2d 253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)