Opinion
Civil Action No: 1:10-cv-00115
01-13-2012
DYLAN J. TREVINO, A Minor, Suing By His Next Friend and Guardian, DIANA TREVINO, and DIANA TREVINO, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. BLITZ U.S.A., INC.; LAM 2011 HOLDINGS, LLC, f/k/a BLITZ HOLDINGS, LLC; KINDERHOOK CAPITAL FUND II, L.P.; BLITZ ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, INC.; BLITZ ACQUISITION, LLC; and BLITZ RE HOLDINGS, LLC, Defendants.
JUDGE
JURY DEMANDEI
DEFENDANT KINDERHOOK CAPITAL FUND II, L.P.'S
AMENDED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY MEMORANDUM
On December 22, 2011, Defendant Kinderhook Capital Fund II, L.P. filed a Motion to transfer Plaintiffs' veil piercing claim to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1412 and 28 U.S.C. § 1404 or, in the alternative, to stay the claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and the Court's inherent power to manage its docket. On January 9, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a Response to Defendant's Motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.01, Defendant seeks leave of Court to file the Reply Memorandum attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Our prior Motion mistakenly indicated that Plaintiffs' Response was untimely. We apologize for the error and have attached a revised Reply Memorandum.