From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trentadue v. Buckler Auto. Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 28, 2007
480 Mich. 1202 (Mich. 2007)

Opinion

Nos. 128579, 128623-25.

September 28, 2007.

Reported at 479 Mich 378.


Rehearings Denied September 28, 2007:


We would grant rehearing.


I dissent from the majority of four's decision to deny plaintiffs' motion for a rehearing and repeat the concluding paragraph of my dissent from the majority's opinion in this case, issued July 25, 2007:

Because I disagree with the majority's conclusion that with the enactment of the Revised Judicature Act, the Legislature sought to abrogate the discovery rule, I would affirm the Court of Appeals decision applying the common-law discovery rule and tolling the period of limitations where plaintiff could not have reasonably discovered the elements of a wrongful death cause of action within the limitations period. [Trentadue v Buckler Automatic Lawn Sprinkler Co, 479 Mich 378, 407 (2007) (WEAVER, J., dissenting).]

Clearly, the majority of four's decision in this case reaches an absurd and unjust result, and lacks common sense.


Summaries of

Trentadue v. Buckler Auto. Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 28, 2007
480 Mich. 1202 (Mich. 2007)
Case details for

Trentadue v. Buckler Auto. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DAYLE TRENTADUE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of MARGARETTE F…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Sep 28, 2007

Citations

480 Mich. 1202 (Mich. 2007)