From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tremaine v. Tremaine

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jul 27, 1994
645 A.2d 1020 (Conn. 1994)

Opinion

Herman H. Tarnow, in support of the petition.

Wesley W. Horton, in opposition.

Decided July 27, 1994


The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 785 (AC 11164), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court misconstrue the initial presentation of the separation agreement as an `approved agreement' with respect to the award of alimony where the initial agreement reserved the determination of alimony for a date in the future?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that in a separation agreement that reserves the issue of `alimony' for determination at a later date, that the term `alimony' was limited to periodic alimony and did not include lump sum alimony?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14985.


Summaries of

Tremaine v. Tremaine

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jul 27, 1994
645 A.2d 1020 (Conn. 1994)
Case details for

Tremaine v. Tremaine

Case Details

Full title:NANCY TREMAINE v. JOHN TREMAINE

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jul 27, 1994

Citations

645 A.2d 1020 (Conn. 1994)
645 A.2d 1020

Citing Cases

Tremaine v. Tremaine

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that in a separation agreement that reserves the issue of…