From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Treez, Inc. v. United States Dep't of Homeland Sec.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 12, 2023
22-cv-07027-RS (N.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-07027-RS

07-12-2023

TREEZ, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER FOR BRIEFING

RICHARD SEEBORG CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendants have filed a motion for relief from a non-dispositive order of the magistrate judge, and erroneously docketed a briefing schedule. See Civil Local Rule 72-2(d) (“Unless otherwise ordered by the assigned District Judge, no response need be filed and no hearing will be held concerning the motion.”). The briefing schedule in the docket may be disregarded. Plaintiffs, however, may file a response to the motion, not to exceed 7 pages (not including declarations and exhibits) no later than July 26, 2023. The matter then will be taken under submission without additional briefing or a hearing, unless otherwise ordered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Treez, Inc. v. United States Dep't of Homeland Sec.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 12, 2023
22-cv-07027-RS (N.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Treez, Inc. v. United States Dep't of Homeland Sec.

Case Details

Full title:TREEZ, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 12, 2023

Citations

22-cv-07027-RS (N.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2023)