From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Travelers Indemnity Company v. General Medicine PC

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
May 30, 2007
Civil No. 06-455-DRH (S.D. Ill. May. 30, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-455-DRH.

May 30, 2007


ORDER


Before the court is Defendant General Medicine, P.C.'s Motion to Quash Notices of Depositions and Motion for Protective Order. (Doc. 46).

Defendant seeks an order quashing the notices of depositions of three of its employees, Sansovich, Kamiski, and Wrona. These depositions were the subject of earlier motions; on May 11, 2007, this court ordered that the witnesses be produced for deposition by June 8, 2007. See, Doc. 41.

The depositions are now scheduled for May 31, 2007. General Medicine seeks an order quashing the notices because, it says, on May 15, 2007, it "confessed the allegations contained in [the] Second Amended Complaint which concern [Travelers] denial of any obligation to tender a defense and indemnify General Medicine . . ." Doc. 46, ¶ 1. General Medicine further states that it "has admitted that Travelers Indemnity Company does not have said duty." Doc. 46, ¶ 3.

The court is, frankly, mystified. General Medicine has not filed any pleading with this court in which it that confesses that Travelers does not have any duty to defend or indemnify it on Dr. Monke's workers compensation claim.

Upon consideration and for good cause shown, Defendant General Medicine, P.C.'s Motion to Quash Notices of Depositions and Motion for Protective Order (Doc. 46) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Travelers Indemnity Company v. General Medicine PC

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
May 30, 2007
Civil No. 06-455-DRH (S.D. Ill. May. 30, 2007)
Case details for

Travelers Indemnity Company v. General Medicine PC

Case Details

Full title:TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. GENERAL MEDICINE PC, and JAMIE…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Illinois

Date published: May 30, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 06-455-DRH (S.D. Ill. May. 30, 2007)