From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 2000
277 A.D.2d 100 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

November 16, 2000.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barry Cozier, J.), entered on or about October 4, 1999, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs' claims for recovery under reinsurance contracts, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Mary Kay Vyskocil, for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert B. Robinson, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Williams, J.P., Mazzarelli, Lerner, Buckley, Friedman, JJ.


In view of our affirmance today of the appealed order in Travelers Casualty and Surety Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, et al, (the "Koppers" litigation), the presently appealed order, raising identical appellate issues, must be affirmed as well.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 2000
277 A.D.2d 100 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London

Case Details

Full title:TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, ETC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 16, 2000

Citations

277 A.D.2d 100 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
716 N.Y.S.2d 297

Citing Cases

Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London

In a cogent decision, Supreme Court dismissed the complaint on the ground that Travelers' allocation did not…

Travelers Cas. & Surety Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's

The AppealsOn November 1.6, 2000, in two separate decisions, the Appellate Division, First Department,…