Summary
analyzing an identical State Farm Virus Exclusion Clause and holding that the plain language of the Virus Exclusion Clause precluded plaintiff's claim for coverage regarding COVID-19 related losses because “the Virus Exclusion unambiguously excludes loss caused by virus.”
Summary of this case from S. Orthopaedic Specialists v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Opinion
Civil Action 21-0635
10-29-2021
TRAVEL MACHINE LOUISIANA, LLC v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO.
WHITEHURST, MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JUDGMENT
MICHAEL J. JUNEAU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
For the reasons assigned in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and having thoroughly reviewed the record, and considering the lack of written objections filed, and concurring with the findings of the Magistrate Judge under the applicable law;
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) [Doc. 14], filed by the defendant, State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., is GRANTED.