From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Transit Graphics Ltd. v. Arco Distributing, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 8, 1994
202 A.D.2d 241 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 8, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (John R. O'Shaugnessy, J.).


There was no basis to vacate the default since defendant failed to substantiate the law office failure claimed as the excuse for the default.

We also note that as the amount in dispute was a sum certain, there was no need for an inquest (Reynolds Sec. v. Underwriters Bank Trust Co., 44 N.Y.2d 568, 572). We have considered defendant's remaining issues and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Ross, Rubin and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Transit Graphics Ltd. v. Arco Distributing, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 8, 1994
202 A.D.2d 241 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Transit Graphics Ltd. v. Arco Distributing, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TRANSIT GRAPHICS LTD., Respondent, v. ARCO DISTRIBUTING, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 8, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 241 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
608 N.Y.S.2d 442

Citing Cases

Van Kleeck v. Horton Memorial Hospital

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the plaintiffs' motion is denied, and the…

Seaport Park Condo. v. Gr. N.Y. Mut. Ins.

It is appropriate for this court to determine the extent of damages owed to both Able and Matco, rather than…