From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trans Advantage v. Pinos Altos Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
May 16, 2014
No. CV 14-1005-TUC-FRZ (JR) (D. Ariz. May. 16, 2014)

Opinion

No. CV 14-1005-TUC-FRZ (JR)

05-16-2014

Trans Advantage, Plaintiff, v. Pinos Altos Group, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Rateau that recommends granting Plaintiff's motion for remand. As Defendants' objections do not undermine the analysis and proper conclusion reached by Magistrate Judge Rateau, Defendants' objections are rejected and the Report and Recommendation is adopted.

The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court reviews for clear error the unobjected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation. Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12) is accepted and adopted. (2) Plaintiff's motion for remand is granted. This action is remanded to its original forum in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri, Cause No. 13SL-CC-03951. (3) Defendants' "request for leave of court to file a motion to dismiss" (Doc. 15) is denied. (4) The Clerk of the Court shall close the file in this case.

__________

Frank R. Zapata

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Trans Advantage v. Pinos Altos Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
May 16, 2014
No. CV 14-1005-TUC-FRZ (JR) (D. Ariz. May. 16, 2014)
Case details for

Trans Advantage v. Pinos Altos Grp.

Case Details

Full title:Trans Advantage, Plaintiff, v. Pinos Altos Group, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: May 16, 2014

Citations

No. CV 14-1005-TUC-FRZ (JR) (D. Ariz. May. 16, 2014)