From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tran v. Diaz

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Nov 3, 2013
CV 11-5482-DOC (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2013)

Opinion


JIMIE TRAN, Petitioner, v. R. M. DIAZ, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 11-5482-DOC (DTB) United States District Court, C.D. California. November 3, 2013

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Second Amended Petition with prejudice.


Summaries of

Tran v. Diaz

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Nov 3, 2013
CV 11-5482-DOC (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Tran v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:JIMIE TRAN, Petitioner, v. R. M. DIAZ, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Nov 3, 2013

Citations

CV 11-5482-DOC (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2013)

Citing Cases

Bisel v. Fisher

Such action is not inappropriate. See, e.g., Scott v. Swarthout, 2012 WL 2839804 (E.D. Cal. 2012) (shortly…