From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tramontano v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 1997
239 A.D.2d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 12, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the Town of Islip.

The plaintiff purportedly was injured when she fell as a result of stepping in an alleged pothole in a roadway or driveway owned by the defendant Town of Islip. Pursuant to Town Law § 65-a (2) and Town of Islip Code § 47A-3 (A), no civil action to recover damages for injuries sustained as a result of a defect in Town property may be maintained against the Town unless written notice of the defective condition was actually given to the Town Clerk or the Town Commissioner of Public Works and there was a failure to repair the condition within a reasonable time thereafter. The Town moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint inreliance on the foregoing provisions. In support of the motion, the Town submitted evidence which unequivocally demonstrated that no prior written notice of the alleged defect had been received and no work order to repair any such defect had been issued. Accordingly, the Town prima facie established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851). Inasmuch as the plaintiff failed to come forward with evidence indicating that the Town created the condition or that the responsible Town officials were aware of its existence, she failed to raise a triable issue of fact, and the complaint must be dismissed (see, Monteleone v. Incorporated Vil. of Floral Park, 74 N.Y.2d 917; Goldston v. Town of Babylon, 145 A.D.2d 534).

Mangano, P.J., Ritter, Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tramontano v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 1997
239 A.D.2d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Tramontano v. County of Suffolk

Case Details

Full title:ANTOINETTE TRAMONTANO, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 12, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 342

Citing Cases

De Flores v. Cnty. of Suffolk

The Court agrees with the County Defendants' assertion that the Charter section requiring notice is…

Tramontano v. County of Suffolk

Decided September 11, 1997 Appeal from 2d Dept: 239 A.D.2d 407 MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO…