From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trahan v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Jun 20, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2803 (W.D. La. Jun. 20, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2803

06-20-2016

KEVIN TRAHAN v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO.


MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment [Doc. No. 9] is hereby GRANTED, and that judgment be entered in favor of Defendant declaring that Plaintiff's state law claim for unpaid benefits under the Plan is completely preempted by ERISA, and thus, recast as a claim under ERISA § 502(a)(1)(B).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in the event any issues of plan term interpretation arise in the course of plaintiff's claim for wrongful denial of benefits, the court shall review the issue(s) under an abuse of discretion standard.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's state law claim for penalties under Louisiana Revised Statute § 22:1821 is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, as preempted.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 20th day of June, 2016.

/s/ _________

ROBERT G. JAMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Trahan v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Jun 20, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2803 (W.D. La. Jun. 20, 2016)
Case details for

Trahan v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN TRAHAN v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Jun 20, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2803 (W.D. La. Jun. 20, 2016)

Citing Cases

Sanat V. Sanghani, MD, LLC v. United Healthcare Servs., Inc.

Accordingly, Sanghani's claim under La. R.S. 22:1821 should be dismissed with prejudice as preempted. See…

Gonzales v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.

This statute does not establish a new legal duty because it does not "impose any liability upon [defendant]…