From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tracey H. J. v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
Dec 16, 2021
Civil Action 3:20cv564 (E.D. Va. Dec. 16, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:20cv564

12-16-2021

TRACEY H.J., Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


FINAL ORDER

M. Hannah Lauck, United States District Judge

This matter comes before the Court on the December 1, 2021 Report and Recommendation issued by the Honorable Mark R. Colombell, United States Magistrate Judge (the “R&R”). (ECF No. 34). The R&R recommends that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment be denied and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted because the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”): (1) properly assessed Plaintiffs residual functional capacity by considering the totality of the evidence; (2) properly considered Plaintiffs subjective complaints of pain; and, (3) properly assessed Dr. Higg's treatment records. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has expired. (See R&R 26 (providing Plaintiff fourteen days to file objections).)

Finding no error, the Court:

(1) ADOPTS the findings and recommendations as set forth in the R&R, (ECF No. 34);

(2) DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 27);

(3) GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 28);

(4) AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner; and, (5) DIRECTS the Clerk to CLOSE this case.

Let the Clerk send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tracey H. J. v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
Dec 16, 2021
Civil Action 3:20cv564 (E.D. Va. Dec. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Tracey H. J. v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:TRACEY H.J., Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia

Date published: Dec 16, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 3:20cv564 (E.D. Va. Dec. 16, 2021)

Citing Cases

Bumbrey v. Kijakazi

“The burden of proof remains with the claimant through step four of the analysis, such that []he must prove…