From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TPZ Corp. v. Reddington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 29, 1997
239 A.D.2d 301 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 29, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.),


We agree with the IAS Court that plaintiffs' conclusory allegations of legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duties failed to give the law firm defendants notice of the acts claimed to constitute such torts and the damages sustained by plaintiffs' assignor as a result. Plaintiffs' request for leave to replead was properly denied in view of the documentary evidence showing that most of the transactions they would put in issue were excepted from the assignment on which they must rely for standing, and in the absence of an affidavit by anyone with knowledge of the facts.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Nardelli, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

TPZ Corp. v. Reddington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 29, 1997
239 A.D.2d 301 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

TPZ Corp. v. Reddington

Case Details

Full title:TPZ CORPORATION et al., Appellants, v. ROBERT REDDINGTON et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 29, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 301 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 855

Citing Cases

Wachsman v. Catcendix Corp.

Plaintiffs do not state claims for breach of fiduciary duty or for breach of the covenant of good faith and…

Shapiro v. Ettenson

Instead, the complaint contains only conclusory allegations of breaches of fiduciary duties, without alleging…