From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Townsend v. Sacramento Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 7, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2288 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-2288 CKD P

01-07-2013

REBIO RONNIE TOWNSEND, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT., et al, Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has consented to this court's jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 4.) By an order filed November 19, 2012, plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint that stated a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in dismissal of this action. (Dkt. No. 8.) The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order and has not filed an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Townsend v. Sacramento Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 7, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2288 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Townsend v. Sacramento Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

Case Details

Full title:REBIO RONNIE TOWNSEND, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT., et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 7, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-2288 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2013)