Opinion
Civil Action 4:19-CV-70-SA-JMV
07-12-2021
JASON TOWNS PLAINTIFF v. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. DEFENDANTS
ORDER
SHARI ON AYCOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On May 24, 2021, Magistrate Judge Virden entered a Report and Recommendation [68]. The Report and Recommendation [68] sets forth an extensive procedural history of the case and ultimately reaches the conclusion that the Plaintiff's Motion [64] requesting permission to serve Defendant Eugene Antonio Shorter out of time should be denied. Magistrate Judge Virden clearly set forth the reasoning for her recommendation. The Report and Recommendation [68] specifically advised the parties as to the applicable procedure for filing an objection to the Report and Recommendation. Although the time to file an objection has expired, no objection has been filed.
“With respect to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections were raised, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record.” Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 644 F.Supp.2d 824, 828 (E.D. Tex. 2009) (citing Douglass v. UnitedServs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation [68] and the record as a whole, the Court finds that there is no plain error.
The Court ADOPTS IN FULL the Report and Recommendation [68]. The Plaintiff's Motion [64] is DENIED. The Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Shorter in his individual capacity are dismissed without prejudice.
SO ORDERED.