From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toure v. Uscic Cleveland District Office

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 21, 2010
Case No. 2:07-cv-980 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 21, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:07-cv-980.

April 21, 2010


ORDER


On March 29, 2010, the Court noted that the defendant had never been served with the complaint, and this Court ordered plaintiff to show good cause within ten days why this action should not be dismissed, or face dismissal of this action for failure to make service pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). Plaintiff has not responded to this order, and the file still does not reflect that service has been made.

Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) provides:

If a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the court — on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff — must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But, if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.

Because plaintiff has failed to show good cause why service was not made within 120 days, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

Toure v. Uscic Cleveland District Office

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 21, 2010
Case No. 2:07-cv-980 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 21, 2010)
Case details for

Toure v. Uscic Cleveland District Office

Case Details

Full title:Mariame Toure, Plaintiff, v. USCIC Cleveland District Office, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Apr 21, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:07-cv-980 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 21, 2010)