From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toth v. Kay & Kay Realty Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 11, 1972
310 A.2d 730 (N.J. 1972)

Opinion

Argued October 11, 1972 —

Decided October 11, 1972.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Ronald Spivack, argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant ( Messrs. Spivack and Kogos, attorneys).

Mr. Robert T. Quackenboss, argued the cause for defendants-respondents, City of Perth Amboy, et al. ( Messrs. Burton Quackenboss, attorneys; Mr. Frederick A. Simon, on the brief).

Mr. Harold G. Smith, argued the cause for defendant-respondent, Kay Kay Realty Corp. ( Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman Spitzer, attorneys; Mr. Harold G. Smith, on the brief.)


A petition for certification having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same,

It is hereupon Ordered that the petition for certification is granted, ( 62 N.J. 86) the decision of the Appellate Division is reversed and the restoration of the case to the trial list by the trial judge is affirmed.

For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, HALL and MOUNTAIN and Judges SULLIVAN and LEWIS — 6.

Opposed — None.


Summaries of

Toth v. Kay & Kay Realty Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 11, 1972
310 A.2d 730 (N.J. 1972)
Case details for

Toth v. Kay & Kay Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BERT TOTH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. KAY KAY REALTY CORP., ET AL.…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Oct 11, 1972

Citations

310 A.2d 730 (N.J. 1972)
310 A.2d 730