From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tory v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Feb 15, 2013
Case No. 3:12cv00315 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 15, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12cv00315

02-15-2013

MARQUISHA M. TORY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.


District Judge Thomas M. Rose

Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington


ORDER

Plaintiff brings this social security case pro se. The Court previously granted her application to proceed in forma pauperis and the Clerk of Court issued summons. Yet the Commissioner explains, summons has not been perfected. (Doc. #6, PageID at 16). The present record does not indicate or explain why this service did not occur. It appears, moreover, that Plaintiff was not at fault and that service was correctly issued to the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio, to the U.S. Attorney General in Washington, D.C., and to the Social Security Administration. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i); see also Doc. #3.

Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to again serve summons and a copy of the Complaint as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i).

______________________

Sharon L. Ovington

Chief United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Tory v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Feb 15, 2013
Case No. 3:12cv00315 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Tory v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MARQUISHA M. TORY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Feb 15, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12cv00315 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 15, 2013)