From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torres v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 27, 1995
214 A.D.2d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 27, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan J. Saks, J.).


It was error for the IAS Court to grant summary judgment dismissing the complaint in this action for personal injuries arising from plaintiff's slip and fall on the stairway of an apartment building owned by defendant. Plaintiff's proofs presented a triable issue with respect to defendant's constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition upon the stairs between the 18th and 17th floors, which defendant failed to rebut as a matter of law (see, Colt v Great Atl. Pac. Tea Co., 209 A.D.2d 294). The affidavits of plaintiff and a neighbor were sufficient to permit an inference at trial that defendant had actual knowledge of vagrants congregating and urinating in the stairwell, thereby placing defendant on constructive notice with respect to each specific recurrence of he dangerous condition (Bronx County Pub. Adm'r v New York City Hous. Auth., 182 A.D.2d 517).

In view of the foregoing, it is unnecessary to reach plaintiff's contention with respect to inadequate lighting.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Torres v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 27, 1995
214 A.D.2d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Torres v. New York City Housing Authority

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPHINE TORRES, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 27, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
625 N.Y.S.2d 536

Citing Cases

Quarles v. Columbia Sussex Corp.

The defendants are ultimately charged with establishing the absence of notice as a matter of law. See Torres…

Joyce Gordon v. Waldbaum, Inc.

The court correctly denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment. Contrary to the defendant's…