From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torres v. Diaz

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Oct 6, 2021
19cv1964 LAB (JLB) (S.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2021)

Opinion

19cv1964 LAB (JLB)

10-06-2021

EDUARDO TORRES, Petitioner, v. RALPH DIAZ, Secretary, et al., Respondents.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY [Dkt. 82]

Petitioner Eduardo Torres has moved for a certificate of appealability with respect to Magistrate Judge Burkhardt's Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) which, in relevant part, denied Torres's motion for leave to amend, and the Court's March 23, 2021 Order adopting that portion of the R&R. (Dkt. 82).

Rule 11, 28 U.S.C.A. foll. § 2254, governs certificates of appealability for habeas corpus petitions brought, as this one was, under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.Rule 11 requires the Court to “issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant.” But the Court's order wasn't a “final order” susceptible to appeal. An order is “final” if it “ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute judgment.” Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Central Pension Fund of Intern. Union of Operating Eng'rs & Participating Emp'rs, 571 U.S. 177, 183 (2014). The order that Torres seeks to appeal didn't do that-despite the denial of leave to amend, his initial and still-operative petition has live claims and the litigation is ongoing. (See Dkt. 50; Dkt. 51; Dkt. 90 (U.S. Court of Appeals order stating that the Court “has not issued any orders that are final or appealable”)).

Torres' motion seeks a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, which applies to petitions brought under 28 U.S.C. §2255. While the Court can't apply § 2253 to Torres' petition, the analysis and result under that statute would be the same.

Torres' Motion for a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED.

At the time he filed his petition, Torres was housed at Salinas Valley State Prison. Based on more recent filings-and the return as undeliverable of several recent documents-it appears he is presently incarcerated at the California Health Care Facility in Stockton, California. (See, e.g., ECF Nos. 82; 89; 92.) The Clerk is ORDERED to modify the docket to reflect Torres' current address and direct all further correspondence with Petitioner to: BD8991, California Health Care Facility, P.O. Box 32110, Stockton, CA 95213. Torres is ORDERED to file a notice of change of address if his address changes again.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Torres v. Diaz

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Oct 6, 2021
19cv1964 LAB (JLB) (S.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Torres v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:EDUARDO TORRES, Petitioner, v. RALPH DIAZ, Secretary, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Oct 6, 2021

Citations

19cv1964 LAB (JLB) (S.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2021)