From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torres v. City of New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 27, 2020
19 Civ. 6332 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 27, 2020)

Opinion

19 Civ. 6332 (ER)

07-27-2020

WILFREDO TORRES, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK; NEIL VERAS; PATRICIA DE JESUS; JOHN DOE, POLICE OFFICER #1; JOHN DOE, POLICE OFFICER #2; JOHN DOE, POLICE OFFICER #3; NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS JOHN DOE, MD #1, Defendants.


ORDER :

Wilfredo Torres, proceeding pro se, alleges constitutional violations by the City of New York (the "City"), New York City Health and Hospitals, Neil Veras, Patricia De Jesus, three John Doe Police Officers and a John Doe doctor (the "John Doe Defendants"). Docs. 2, 12. On February 7, 2020 the Court directed the City, pursuant to Valentin v. Dinkins, 121 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 1997), to identify the John Doe Defendants (the "Valentin Order"). Doc. 14 at 3. On June 24, 2020, the Court directed the City to respond to the Valentin Order by August 7, 2020. Doc. 34 at 2. On July 20, 2020, Torres moved to compel production of "body camera videos, all personal and official notes, and all other official documents" from the police officer defendants concerning a raid of his apartment on February 27, 2019. Doc. 48 at 1. On July 27, 2020, the City opposed, arguing that the City is the only defendant who has been served and discovery has yet to commence. Doc. 51 at 1-2 & n.2. The City further argues that Torres has not met and conferred with the City regarding this request before asking for judicial intervention, or even served a discovery request. Id. at 51 at 2; Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1), 37(a)(3)(B). Finally, the City contends that it cannot comply with Torres' request because the John Doe Police Officers have yet to be identified. Doc. 51 at 2.

The Court agrees that the request is premature and denies it without prejudice to renew at the appropriate time. Following the City's compliance with the Valentin Order, the parties are directed to meet and confer pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) regarding discovery.

A copy of this Order will be sent by Chambers to Wilfredo Torres, 470 Second Avenue, Apt. 2A, New York, New York 10016.

It is SO ORDERED. Dated: July 27, 2020

New York, New York

/s/_________

EDGARDO RAMOS, U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Torres v. City of New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 27, 2020
19 Civ. 6332 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 27, 2020)
Case details for

Torres v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:WILFREDO TORRES, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK; NEIL VERAS; PATRICIA DE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jul 27, 2020

Citations

19 Civ. 6332 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 27, 2020)