From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torres v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Oct 20, 2008
CASE NO. 8:08CV244 (D. Neb. Oct. 20, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 8:08CV244.

October 20, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Court's own motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m), which states in pertinent part:

If a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the court — on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff — must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.

The court file shows that this case was filed on June 11, 2008, and the 120-day period has expired. The record does not show that the plaintiff has effected service upon the defendant.

IT IS ORDERED that, on or before November 3, 2008, plaintiff shall either:

1. Effect service on the defendant and file proof of same with the court; or
2. Show cause why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to effect service within the time limit specified in Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m).


Summaries of

Torres v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Oct 20, 2008
CASE NO. 8:08CV244 (D. Neb. Oct. 20, 2008)
Case details for

Torres v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO TORRES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, as Commissioner of the…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Oct 20, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 8:08CV244 (D. Neb. Oct. 20, 2008)