From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toro v. Daram

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 24, 2023
2:22-cv-0725 DJC AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-0725 DJC AC P

07-24-2023

STEVEN DEL TORO, Plaintiff, v. VASUKI DARAM, et al., Defendant.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed May 20, 2023, this case was referred to the court's Post-Screening ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Project and stayed for a period of 120 days. ECF No. 28. That order provided defendant the opportunity to request opting out of the ADR Project based on a good faith belief that a settlement conference would be a waste of resources. Id. at 2. Defendant Daram now requests to opt out of the Post-Screening ADR Project. ECF No. 3. Having reviewed the request, the court finds good cause to grant it.

Defendant Schultz has yet to be served. See ECF No. 30.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion to opt out of the Post-Screening ADR Project (ECF No. 31) is GRANTED.

2. The ADR stay of this action, commencing May 30, 2023 (ECF No. 28), is LIFTED.

3. Within twenty-one days of the filing of this order, defendant Daram shall file a response to the complaint.


Summaries of

Toro v. Daram

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 24, 2023
2:22-cv-0725 DJC AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Toro v. Daram

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN DEL TORO, Plaintiff, v. VASUKI DARAM, et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 24, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-0725 DJC AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2023)