From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Topsnik v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 5, 2017
2016-2405 (Fed. Cir. May. 5, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2405

05-05-2017

GERD TOPSNIK, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee

CHARLES H. MAGNUSON, Law Offices of Charles Magnuson, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. ANTHONY T. SHEEHAN, Tax Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by RICHARD FARBER, CAROLINE D. CIRAOLO.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:14-cv-00275-EDK, Judge Elaine Kaplan.

JUDGMENT

CHARLES H. MAGNUSON, Law Offices of Charles Magnuson, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. ANTHONY T. SHEEHAN, Tax Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by RICHARD FARBER, CAROLINE D. CIRAOLO. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 5, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Topsnik v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 5, 2017
2016-2405 (Fed. Cir. May. 5, 2017)
Case details for

Topsnik v. United States

Case Details

Full title:GERD TOPSNIK, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 5, 2017

Citations

2016-2405 (Fed. Cir. May. 5, 2017)