From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tompkins v. Aetna Casualty Surety Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 10, 1985
331 S.E.2d 907 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

70012.

DECIDED MAY 10, 1985. REHEARING DENIED MAY 22, 1985.

Action on policy. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Etheridge.

Barry A. Karp, Harold Karp, for appellant.

Kenneth F. Dunham, William Lewis Spearman, for appellee.


Dolores Tompkins, while a pedestrian, was injured by an automobile driven by an Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna) policyholder. Aetna paid Tompkins the basic personal injury protection benefits in accordance with the policy limits. Tompkins tendered additional premiums to Aetna and made demand for the maximum additional PIP benefits. Aetna petitioned for a declaratory judgment and both sides moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Aetna and against Tompkins. Tompkins appeals.

Pretermitting the other issues raised by appellant, it affirmatively appears from the record that the policyholder has never made a demand for optional benefits and thus this case is controlled by Bailey v. Ga. Mut. Ins. Co., 168 Ga. App. 706, 708 ( 309 S.E.2d 870) (1983) where we held that "a demand for increased coverage by the policyholder is necessary before those who would be incidental or third-party beneficiaries as `other insureds' can seek optional benefits." Id. at 708. See also Occidental Fire Cas. Co. v. Buyce, 173 Ga. App. 881 ( 328 S.E.2d 574) (1985); Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co. v. Timmons, 172 Ga. App. 366 ( 323 S.E.2d 183) (1984); Vandergriff v. Travelers Ins. Co., 172 Ga. App. 198 ( 322 S.E.2d 522) (1984). We find no merit in appellant's argument that appellee by threats coerced its insured not to make demand for optional benefits since the record reveals that appellee's statement simply informed its insured that it would exercise its legal right to file a declaratory judgment proceeding on the policy should she institute a claim for those benefits.

Accordingly, the trial court did not err by granting summary judgment in favor of appellee and denying appellant's motion for summary judgment.

Judgment affirmed. Birdsong, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.


DECIDED MAY 10, 1985 — REHEARING DENIED MAY 22, 1985 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Tompkins v. Aetna Casualty Surety Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 10, 1985
331 S.E.2d 907 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Tompkins v. Aetna Casualty Surety Company

Case Details

Full title:TOMPKINS v. AETNA CASUALTY SURETY COMPANY

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 10, 1985

Citations

331 S.E.2d 907 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)
331 S.E.2d 907

Citing Cases

Butts v. Ga. Cas. c. Co.

(Emphasis supplied.) Accord Dunham v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co., 176 Ga. App. 263, 265 ( 335 S.E.2d 666); Tompkins…