From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tomlinson v. Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 16, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-00016 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-00016 KJM AC P

04-16-2015

BRIAN K. TOMLINSON, Plaintiff, v. LINDA THOMAS, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed January 21, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 3. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order and has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: April 16, 2015

/s/_________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Tomlinson v. Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 16, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-00016 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Tomlinson v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN K. TOMLINSON, Plaintiff, v. LINDA THOMAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 16, 2015

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-00016 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2015)