Opinion
June 13, 1960
In an action to recover damages for libel, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 19, 1959, denying their motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106). Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. In our opinion, the letter involved is not libelous per se. Nolan, P.J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.