From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tolen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Sep 13, 2011
No. ED95439 (Mo. Ct. App. Sep. 13, 2011)

Opinion

No. ED95439

September 13, 2011

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis Honorable John J. Riley.

Edward S. Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, Missouri, for Respondent/Respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Sherri B. Sullivan, J.



ORDER


Alonzo Tolen appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Daugherty v. State, 159 S.W.3d 405, 407 (Mo.App. E.D. 2005). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2009, unless otherwise indicated.


Summaries of

Tolen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Sep 13, 2011
No. ED95439 (Mo. Ct. App. Sep. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Tolen v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALONZO TOLEN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent/Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Sep 13, 2011

Citations

No. ED95439 (Mo. Ct. App. Sep. 13, 2011)