From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toese v. Stonebreaker

United States District Court, D. South Carolina
May 30, 2023
C. A. 1:22-4436-BHH-SVH (D.S.C. May. 30, 2023)

Opinion

C. A. 1:22-4436-BHH-SVH

05-30-2023

Faasiu Toese, Petitioner, v. Warden Donny Stonebreaker, Respondent.


ORDER

Shiva V. Hodges, United States Magistrate Judge

This matter is before the court on the motion of Faasiu Toese (“Petitioner”) to appoint a Samoan interpreter. [ECF No. 25]. The undersigned has reviewed Petitioner's filings and the state record in this case and finds that no interpreter is constitutionally-warranted. Petitioner's communications in English display more than adequate comprehension and communication. Although Petitioner may have difficulty understanding all legal concepts, such issues are faced by native-English speakers and do not appear to be the result of a language barrier. For these reasons, Petitioner's motion is denied.

Petitioner has also moved for an extension of time to respond to Respondent's motion for summary judgment. [ECF No. 25]. Petitioner's motion is granted and his deadline for filing a response is now June 29, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Toese v. Stonebreaker

United States District Court, D. South Carolina
May 30, 2023
C. A. 1:22-4436-BHH-SVH (D.S.C. May. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Toese v. Stonebreaker

Case Details

Full title:Faasiu Toese, Petitioner, v. Warden Donny Stonebreaker, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina

Date published: May 30, 2023

Citations

C. A. 1:22-4436-BHH-SVH (D.S.C. May. 30, 2023)