From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Todd v. Zamora

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 8, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2429 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-2429 AC P

01-08-2013

PHILLIP A. TODD, Plaintiff, v. ZAMORA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed November 15, 2012, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and twenty-eight days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Twenty-eight days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a district judge be assigned to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty- one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

____________________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Todd v. Zamora

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 8, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2429 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Todd v. Zamora

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP A. TODD, Plaintiff, v. ZAMORA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 8, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-2429 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2013)