From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Todd v. Tennessee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 15, 2012
No. 3:12-mc-0033 (M.D. Tenn. May. 15, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-mc-0033

05-15-2012

DAVID B. TODD, III Petitioner, v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Respondent.


GENERAL DOCKET

Judge Trauger


ORDER

On April 16, 2012, an order (Docket Entry No.3) was entered directing the petitioner to either pay the five dollar ($5.00) fee required to file his habeas corpus petition or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

Since the entry of this order, the petitioner has filed a motion to appoint counsel (Docket Entry No.6) and a motion requesting leave to supplement (Docket Entry No.7).

Because the issue of the filing fee has not yet been resolved, the petitioner's pending motions are premature. For that reason, they are hereby DENIED, subject to renewal at a later date.

It is so ORDERED.

_______________

Aleta A. Trauger

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Todd v. Tennessee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 15, 2012
No. 3:12-mc-0033 (M.D. Tenn. May. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Todd v. Tennessee

Case Details

Full title:DAVID B. TODD, III Petitioner, v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: May 15, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-mc-0033 (M.D. Tenn. May. 15, 2012)