From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TITLE INS. CO. v. SMITH, DEBNAM, HIBBERT AND PAHL

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1996
342 N.C. 887 (N.C. 1996)

Opinion

No. 366A95 — Mecklenburg

Filed 8 March 1996

Appeal by defendants pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 119 N.C. App. 608, 459 S.E.2d 801 (1995), affirming in part and reversing in part the judgment entered by Johnston, J., on 25 February 1994 in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, and remanding for a new trial on damages. On 5 October 1995, the Supreme Court allowed both plaintiff's and defendants' petitions for discretionary review of additional issues. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 February 1996.

Perry, Patrick, Farmer Michaux, P.A., by Roy H. Michaux, Jr., and John H. Carmichael, for plaintiff-appellee and -appellant.

Crews Klein, P.C., by Paul I. Klein, James P. Crews, and James N. Freeman, Jr., for defendant-appellees and -appellants.


As to the sole issue brought forward on appeal by the dissent in the Court of Appeals, the decision of the court by Judge Lewis is affirmed except that the following sentence in the opinion is disavowed and stricken: "We agree that plaintiff suffered no actual damages until it cancelled the deed of trust, which it did while the jury deliberated." Title Ins. Co. of Minn. v. Smith, Debnam, Hibbert and Pahl, 119 N.C. App. 608, 611, 459 S.E.2d 801, 804 (1995). As to the additional issues raised in the petitions for discretionary review, discretionary review was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED IN PART AND DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.


Summaries of

TITLE INS. CO. v. SMITH, DEBNAM, HIBBERT AND PAHL

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1996
342 N.C. 887 (N.C. 1996)
Case details for

TITLE INS. CO. v. SMITH, DEBNAM, HIBBERT AND PAHL

Case Details

Full title:TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF MINNESOTA v. SMITH, DEBNAM, HIBBERT AND PAHL, a…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 1, 1996

Citations

342 N.C. 887 (N.C. 1996)
467 S.E.2d 241

Citing Cases

Leary v. N.C. Forest Prod

As to the first factor, our courts have generally focused on whether the attorney's (or other professional's)…

Fox v. Fox

[t]he Courts of this State have held attorneys liable for actions that impact non-client third parties in…