From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Titan Diversified v. Blumberg

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Sep 11, 2003
No. 02-03-066-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 11, 2003)

Opinion

No. 02-03-066-CV.

DELIVERED: September 11, 2003.

Appeal from County Court at Law No. 3 Tarrant County.

Steven M. Hawthorne, Pro Se, Arlington, Texas, for appellants.

Blumberg Associates and Peter Bagley Arlington, Texas, appellee.

PANEL D: DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On July 24, 2003 and August 7, 2003, we notified appellants that their brief had not been filed as required by TEX.R.APP.P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellants or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.

Because appellants' brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Titan Diversified v. Blumberg

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Sep 11, 2003
No. 02-03-066-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 11, 2003)
Case details for

Titan Diversified v. Blumberg

Case Details

Full title:TITAN DIVERSIFIED, INC., CGS WORLDWIDE, INC., INTERSOURCE MANAGEMENT…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Sep 11, 2003

Citations

No. 02-03-066-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 11, 2003)