From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tisdale v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 19, 2023
2:22-cv-0069 DB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-0069 DB

02-19-2023

RICHARD TISDALE, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

DEBOFAH BARNES, UNTIED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In this social security action plaintiff has filed a motion for a 60-day extension of time to file a reply brief. (ECF No. 24.) Both parties have repeatedly sought and obtained multiple extensions of time to brief this action. (ECF Nos. 11, 13, 15, 18, 20, 22.) While the Court does not question the necessity of those requests, the Court is concerned about further delaying the resolution of this action. Plaintiff's motion will, nonetheless, be granted. However, plaintiff will only be granted a 30-day extension of time. And no further extensions of time will be granted.

Both parties have previously consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (ECF No. 7.)

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's February 13, 2023 motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 24) is granted in part; and

2. Plaintiff's reply brief shall be filed within 30 days of the date of this order.


Summaries of

Tisdale v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 19, 2023
2:22-cv-0069 DB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Tisdale v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD TISDALE, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 19, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-0069 DB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2023)