Opinion
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A93-128-067.
Jose Antonio Tirado-Perez, Riverside, CA, pro se.
Sung U. Park, Esq., Law Offices of Sung U. Park, Los Angeles, CA, Vincent Chan, Law Office of Vincent Chan, Pasadena, CA, for Petitioner.
Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Anh-Thu P. Mai, Aviva Poczter, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: O'SCANNLAIN, RYMER, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Jose Antonio Tirado-Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge's denial of his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review whether Tirado-Perez has demonstrated the requisite "exceptional and extremely unusual hardship" for cancellation of removal. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 891 (9th Cir.2003).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.