From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tippens v. Clarke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
May 16, 2013
Civil Action No. 3:12CV688-HEH (E.D. Va. May. 16, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:12CV688-HEH

05-16-2013

ROBERT EARL TIPPENS, JR. Plaintiff, v. HAROLD CLARKE, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)

On November 5, 2012, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff's action. Plaintiff requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. By Memorandum Order entered on February 19, 2013, the Court directed Plaintiff to pay an initial partial filing fee of $36.03 or state under penalty of perjury that he did not have sufficient assets to pay such a fee within eleven (11) days of the date of entry thereof. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff has neither paid the initial partial filing fee nor averred that he cannot pay such a fee. Therefore, Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's disregard of the Court's directive warrants dismissal of the action. Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of the Memorandum Opinion to Plaintiff.

It is so ORDERED.

_______________

HENRY E. HUDSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: May 16, 2013
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Tippens v. Clarke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
May 16, 2013
Civil Action No. 3:12CV688-HEH (E.D. Va. May. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Tippens v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT EARL TIPPENS, JR. Plaintiff, v. HAROLD CLARKE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: May 16, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:12CV688-HEH (E.D. Va. May. 16, 2013)