From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tinsley v. Winston-Salem

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1927
140 S.E. 192 (N.C. 1927)

Opinion

(Filed 23 November, 1927.)

CIVIL ACTION before Finley, J., at February Term, 1927, of FORSYTH.

Wallace Wells for plaintiff.

Fred M. Parrish for defendant.


This was a civil action for damages for personal injury sustained by plaintiff by reason of slipping into an uncovered or unguarded hole or excavation on North Elm Street. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant appealed, assigning errors.


This case was considered by the Court upon a former appeal, which is reported in 192 N.C. p. 597. This decision becomes the law of the case so far as the subsequent trial is concerned. Nobles v. Davenport, 185 N.C. 162; Mfg. Co. v. Hodgins, 192 N.C. 577.

After a careful examination of the record and briefs of counsel for the parties, the court is of the opinion that no error of law was committed upon the trial, and the judgment of the trial court is upheld.

No error.


Summaries of

Tinsley v. Winston-Salem

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1927
140 S.E. 192 (N.C. 1927)
Case details for

Tinsley v. Winston-Salem

Case Details

Full title:CHLOE TINSLEY v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1927

Citations

140 S.E. 192 (N.C. 1927)
140 S.E. 192