Tinsley v. Hill

Full title: DONALD E. TINSLEY, Petitioner, v. T. HILL, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 27, 2023

2:23-cv-01036-TLN-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01036-TLN-EFB

10-27-2023

DONALD E. TINSLEY, Petitioner, v. T. HILL, Warden, Respondent.

EDMUND F. BRENNAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER

EDMUND F. BRENNAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Respondent has moved for a sixty-day enlargement of time to file a response to Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus.

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent's request is granted. The response to Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus shall be filed on or before December 29, 2023.